----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Chinner" <[email protected]>
> To: "Jan Ťulák" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April, 2015 6:35:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] fstests: Tests can use any name now, not 3 digits
> only.
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:49:26PM +0100, Jan Ťulák wrote:
> > Tests can use any name now, not 3 digits only.
> > (e.g. a test can be named "tests/generic/001-some-name")
> >
> > Names are limited to alphanumeric characters and dash and are always
> > prefixed
> > with an unique id for easier identification of a specific test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Ťulák <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Just a small fix in comment to reflect $SUPPORTED_TESTS is in common/rc.
>
> Which I have a couple of nits about, seeing we've settled on an
> acceptible convention. :)
>
> >
> > README | 7 ++++++-
> > check | 9 ++++-----
> > common/rc | 1 +
> > new | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/README b/README
> > index 0c9449a..1841052 100644
> > --- a/README
> > +++ b/README
> > @@ -202,10 +202,15 @@ Test script environment:
> > - When calling getfacl in a test, pass the "-n" argument so
> > that numeric rather than symbolic identifiers are used in
> > the output.
> > + - When creating a new test, it is possible to enter a custom name
> > + for the file. Filenames are in form NNN-custom-name, where NNN
> > + is automatically added by the ./new script as an unique ID,
> > + and "custom-name" is the optional string entered into a prompt
> > + in the ./new script. Note the "NNN-" part is added automatically.
>
> We have a defined format for the test names, yet it does not have
> the clear explanation of what constitutes a valid name i.e. from an
> error message below:
>
> > + echo "Filename must contain only alphanumeric symbols and dash!"
Thanks, I'm adding a note into the readme.
>
> If we have a defined format for the test names, we should enforce
> it strictly and code directly to it. The description here needs to
> spell this out directly.
>
> > @@ -96,21 +95,21 @@ get_group_list()
> > l=$(sed -n < $SRC_DIR/$d/group \
> > -e 's/#.*//' \
> > -e 's/$/ /' \
> > - -e "s;\(^[0-9][0-9][0-9]\).* $grp .*;$SRC_DIR/$d/\1;p")
> > + -e "s;^\($SUPPORTED_TESTS\).* $grp .*;$SRC_DIR/$d/\1;p")
>
> Here we filter by $SUPPORTED_TESTS for valid tests, but....
>
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > BC=$(which bc 2> /dev/null) || BC=
> > +SUPPORTED_TESTS="[a-zA-Z0-9-]\+"
>
> but $SUPPORTED_TESTS doesn't define the correct format for the test
> names. It defines valid characters, but does not enforce the fact
> that the first 3 characters must match [0-9] (i.e. the NNN bit), and
> then the rest is optional but must be alphanumeric symbols and dash.
> i.e it should be matching against:
>
I did it to be "generous on input, strict on output" - the ./new script always
put 3 numbers at the beginning, but if someone for some reason needs to avoid
it, it will still work. Enforcing it is easy, but is it needed?
> # Valid test names start with 3 digits "NNN":
> # "[0-9]\{3\}"
> # followed by an optional "-":
> # "-\?"
> # followed by an optional combination of alphanumeric and "-" chars:
> # "[[:alnum:]-]*"
> # e.g. 999-the-mark-of-fstests
> #
> VALID_TEST_NAME="[0-9]\{3\}-\?[[:alnum:]-]*"
>
> > _require_math()
> > {
> > diff --git a/new b/new
> > index d1f8939..7e9ce2c 100755
> > --- a/new
> > +++ b/new
> > @@ -81,11 +81,14 @@ line=0
> > eof=1
> > [ -f "$tdir/group" ] || usage
> >
> > -for found in `cat $tdir/group | $AWK_PROG '{ print $1 }'`
> > +for found in `cat $tdir/group | tr - ' ' | $AWK_PROG '{ print $1 }'`
> > do
> > line=$((line+1))
> > - if [ -z "$found" ] || [ "$found" == "#" ];then
> > - continue
> > + if [ -z "$found" ] || [ "$found" == "#" ]; then
> > + continue
> > + elif ! echo "$found" | grep -q "^[0-9][0-9][0-9]$"; then
> > + # this one is for tests not named by a number
>
> This should check for "$VALID_TEST_NAME$", too, as it will match
> [0-9]{3}$ test names just fine.
>
> > + continue
> > fi
> > i=$((i+1))
> > id=`printf "%03d" $i`
> > @@ -100,7 +103,47 @@ if [ $eof -eq 1 ]; then
> > id=`printf "%03d" $i`
> > fi
> >
> > -echo "Next test is $id"
> > +echo "Next test id is $id"
> > +
> > +read -p "Append a name to the ID? Test name will be $id-\$name. y,[n]: "
> > -r
> > +if [[ $REPLY = [Yy] ]]; then
> > + # get the new name from user
> > + name=""
> > + while [ "$name" = "" ]; do
> > + read -p "Enter the name: "
> > + if [ "$REPLY" = "" ]; then
> > + echo "For canceling, use ctrl+c."
> > + elif [ -e "$tdir/$id-$REPLY" ]; then
> > + echo "File '$id-$REPLY' already exists, use another
> > one."
> > + echo #
>
> This check should happen *after* input validation, though it should
> never be true because we have selected a unique, unused $id....
This check can be true - ID check is done in a group file, it does not reflects
existence of files with such ID and name. So if you for example interrupt the
./new script after creating the file, but before editing groups, the file can
exist without an entry in groups and the ID is used again.
I agree with validating the input first.
>
> > + elif echo "$REPLY" | grep -q "^$SUPPORTED_TESTS$"; then
> > + name="$REPLY"
>
> i.e. this should be first, and given that we have a well defined
> input validation, we should make that as clear as possible. e.g.
>
> elif echo $REPLY | grep -q "^[[:alnum:]-]$"; then
>
You mean to put the regex directly into the condition? I prefer to keep in the
variable defined in common/rc.
> > + else
> > + echo "Filename must contain only alphanumeric symbols
> > and dash!"
> > + echo "(Used regex: ^$SUPPORTED_TESTS$)"
>
> Don't confuse the poor users with a regex - make it clear what the
> format is in the documentation.
>
Well, I think any user who will write tests for a filesystem knows what regex
is. ;-)
But I take the point, removed.
>
> > + echo
> > + fi
> > + done
> > +
> > + # now find where to insert this name
> > + eof=1
> > + for found in `tail -n +$line $tdir/group | $AWK_PROG '{ print $1 }'`; do
> > + found_id=$(echo "$found" | tr - ' ' | $AWK_PROG '{ print $1 }')
>
> That's an interesting way of cutting up a string.
>
> found_id=$(echo "$found" | cut -d "-" -f 1 -)
:-)
>
> > + line=$((line+1))
> > + if [ -z "$found" ] || [ "$found" == "#" ]; then
> > + continue
> > + elif [[ $found > $name ]] || [ $found_id -gt $id ]; then
>
> This doesn't work. $found will be "298-I-want-a-spoon" or just
> "298", but $name has no number prefix i.e. "but-I-like-sporks". We
> will always have number prefixes, and tests should always have unique
> numbers, so there is no reason to check anything but $id against
> $found_id. Which means:
>
> for found_id in `tail -n +$line $tdir/group | cut -d "-" -f 1" -`; do
> line=$((line+1))
> if [ -z "$found" ] || [ "$found" == "#" ]; then
> continue
> elif [ $found_id -gt $id ]; then
> eof=0
> break
> fi
> done
>
I see. Most probably, it is a relict from before unique IDs.
Fixed, thank you.
Jan
> And once we've done all this and decided on a test name, we should
> finally validate it again against $VALID_TEST_NAME....
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Chinner
> [email protected]
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
