Sorry, I click "send" to early. :(

On 08/03/2015 12:44 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 08/03/2015 12:12 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:06:53PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]>
---
  check         | 2 ++
  common/config | 9 +++++----
[...]
      # no way to check consistency for tmpfs
      ;;
+    ubifs)
+    ;;

There is no fsck.ubifs? How do you validate the filesystem is
consistent?

Yes, currently, we have no fsck.ubifs, but I am planing to add it.

Keep in minds that the people you are asking to review/commit this
code have no idea what UBIFS is or how it works, so you need to
explain why xfstests requires non-standard configuration and
bypassing of the config sanity testing...

There is a document for ubifs, the main reason for this patchset is
ubifs is running on ubi volume which is not a block device.

http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html

Thanx
Yang

Cheers,

Dave.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to