Title: FW: New PIPA/KN Poll on Globalization, Trade and Farm Subsidies
Friends:

To add to our reading.

Bob

------ Forwarded Message
From: PIPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: PIPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:52:51 -0500
To: PIPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New PIPA/KN Poll on Globalization, Trade and Farm Subsidies
  
Thursday,  January 22, 2004    

   
  
PIPA is a joint program of the Center on  Policy Attitudes (COPA <http://www.policyattitudes.org/> )  and the Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland (CISSM <http://www.puaf.umd.edu/CISSM/default.htm> ), School of Public Affairs, University of  Maryland <http://www.umd.edu/> .     


      

Majority  Disapproves of Government Approach to Trade


 Wants  More Efforts to Mitigate Effects on Workers, Environment

 Bush’s  Handling of Trade Net Negative for Reelection
 
 General  Support for Trade Modest and Declining
 
 Majority  Opposes Subsidies to Agribusiness, Favors Them for Small Farmers



A  new PIPA/Knowledge Networks poll finds that the majority of the  American public is critical of US government trade policy and wants the  government to make greater efforts to mitigate the effects of trade on  workers at home and abroad, and on the environment. Presented three  options, only 20% said "I support the growth of international  trade in principle and I approve of the way the US is going about  expanding international trade," while 53% said "I support the  growth of international trade in principle, but I am not satisfied with  the way the US government is dealing with the effects of trade on  American jobs, the poor in other countries and the environment."  Eighteen percent opposed the growth of trade.
 

Americans  are likely to respond favorably to President Bush's new push for job  training. Sixty-three percent said that "government efforts to  help retrain workers who have lost jobs due to international  trade" have not been adequate. This is up from 57% from a poll on  globalization that PIPA conducted in 1999.


Overall,  the Bush administration's handling of trade is a modest net negative  for the president's reelection prospects. Only 21% said that the  president's handling of international trade issues would increase the  likelihood they would vote for him, while 37% said it decreased the  likelihood.


Administration  trade policymakers get fairly poor marks. Asked to rate the level of  attention of administration trade policymakers to a number of  priorities, majorities said the administration gives too little  attention to working Americans (77%), "people like you"  (76%), and the impact of trade on the environment (62%). Perhaps most  striking, 61% said the administration was paying too little attention  to "the growth of the overall American economy," up sharply  from 36% in 1999.


Americans  show concerns about the impact of trade on labor standards and the  environment, with more than 9 in 10 favoring incorporating labor  standards and environmental standards into trade agreements. If such  moves slow down the growth of trade, more than 8 in 10 say that this is  acceptable.


Read More.....
<http://www.pipa.org/whatsnew/html/new_1_22_04.html#1>  



For  more information on the PIPA/KN study see:
 
Report  of Findings  <http://pipa.org/OnlineReports/Globalization/pdf/IntTradeRep_1_22_04.pdf>
 Questionnaire   <http://pipa.org/OnlineReports/Globalization/pdf/IntTradeQuest1_22_04.pdf>
 

  
  

   


   
  

 
   
  
   
    


   
   
  
The Americans and the World Digest <http://www.americans-world.org/>
 
A source of  comprehensive information on US public opinion on international issues.     
   

Program on International Policy  Attitudes
 1779  Massachusetts Avenue NW,
 Suite 510 Washington
DC  20036
 phone: (202)232-7500, fax: (202)232-1159
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

   
 
   
  
All rights reserved. Program on  International Policy Attitudes.
  
  

  

   
  



------ End of Forwarded Message

Reply via email to