More evidence that trade is fertile ground for growing broad coalitions -- more R's than D's opposing CAFTA.  Bjorn
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: [ftaadelegation] Plurality Supports CAFTA

 

Friday, May 28, 2004

PIPA is a joint program of the Center on Policy Attitudes (COPA) and the Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland (CISSM), School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland.

 

Plurality Supports Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) US About to Sign

College Park, MD: A plurality of Americans has shown support for the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) that US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick will sign on May 28th.

In a PIPA/Knowledge Networks poll conducted in January of this year, respondents were told that "the US and some countries of Central America have negotiated a treaty called the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) that is similar to what the US now has with Mexico and Canada in NAFTA."A plurality of 49% said they would favor it, with 42% opposed.

Interestingly, Democrats were more likely to support CAFTA than Republicans. Fifty-three percent of Democrats favored it (41% opposed), while 48% of Republicans were in support (45% opposed). Among the politically important independents, 51% were in favor with 39% opposed.

While no regional differences were evident, support in swing states was a bit lower. Only 44% supported CAFTA while 46% were opposed. Among those who say they vote, support was even lower at 40%, with 52% opposing it.

Support for CAFTA was also closely tied to feelings about job security in a globalizing world. Among the three in ten who said globalization has had a negative effect on their job security, 60% oppose CAFTA, and only 31% favor CAFTA. Support for CAFTA rises to 56%, however, among those who said globalization has had, on balance, no effect on their job security. Among those who said globalization has had a positive effect on their job security, 74% favor CAFTA.

This support for CAFTA is approximately the same as support for NAFTA. Asked "Do you think the North America Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA, has been good or bad for the United States?"47% said it has been good, while 39% said it has been bad.

These findings were part of a larger PIPA/KN study entitled "Americans on Globalization, Trade, and Farm Subsidies."The PIPA/KN poll was conducted with a nationwide sample of 1,896 respondents from December 19 to January 5. The margin of error was plus or minus 2.3%-4%, depending on whether the question was administered to the whole sample, two thirds, half, or one third of the sample.

To view the full report and questionnaire, please go to http://www.pipa.org

The poll was fielded by Knowledge Networks using its nationwide panel, which is randomly selected from the entire adult population and subsequently provided internet access. For more information about this methodology, go to www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp.

Funding for this research was provided by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Ford Foundation.

 

 

New ‘Interview’ With the American Public in Foreign Policy

The current issue of Foreign Policy magazine features an "interview’ with the American public on US foreign policy by PIPA director Steven Kull, titled "Voice of a Superpower."Written as a dialogue, each answer by "JQ Public"reflects a composite of majority positions in recent polls. Topics covered include Iraq, terrorism, North Korea, globalization and trade.

In Foreign Policy’s website version, each statement by "JQ Public"is followed by a link to the actual survey results that lie behind it. To read "Voice of a Superpower"on foreignpolicy.com, use this link.

 

The Americans and the World Digest
A source of comprehensive information on US public opinion on international issues.

 

 

Program on International Policy Attitudes
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW,
Suite 510 Washington DC 20036
phone: (202)232-7500, fax: (202)232-1159
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

All rights reserved. Program on International Policy Attitudes.

 

 

 

Reply via email to