>Hi,

>   It is great to talk to a fellow developer. I have
>downloaded JFTP4I from sourceforge
>(http://sourceforge.net/projects/jftp4i). I could not
>find the source code. Will you please share the source
>code so that I can study it.

        Sure,

        Sorry, you can download the source using two different ways. 
First, you can download using the anonymous CVS access to 
cvs.sourceforge.net (if you cannot do that, you still can navegate in the 
CVS view on the browser, and download file by file - a really pain in the 
... :-P - using the link http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jftp4i/. 
You can also download the source (together with the binary files) through 
this release:http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/jftp4i/jftp4i.jar

        To access the files using CVS, you can use something like this:
                cvs 
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jftp4i login
                cvs -z3 
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jftp4i co -P jftp4i 

        Obs.: I don´t like to use cvs on the command line, so i use the 
CVS client inside MyEclipse 8-).
        PS.: Part of the documentation (inside the classes) are still in 
Portuguese (sorry), and we are currently working to change that (but if 
you understand Portuguese, you will have no problem). If you have any 
doubts... just screen ..., just kidding, i will try to help (if i can) 
:-).

        I really hope that we can work together as a team. Anxiously wait 
for your response.

        []s,

                João

>Thanks,
>Rana Bhattacharyya



>>--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Rana,
>> 
>>         It´s really nice to meet you, i have
>> downloaded the lastest source 
>> code for JFTPServer, and in a first view i have
>> identified a lot of 
>> similarities with JFTP4I. I think that we must
>> discuss, to see the 
>> benefits in this (to both sides) approch. But in a
>> first view, the areas 
>> that i think we can help are basically in the
>> management of the conteiner 
>> for different applications and transactions - a
>> feature that we are 
>> current implementing in JFTP4I. Both solutions have
>> implemented the rfcs 
>> to manage the requests, so we must discuss if it's
>> interesting to join 
>> these parts.
>> 
>>         Tell me what you think. :-)
>> 
>>         []s,
>> 
>>         João

Reply via email to