I agree with you. We can split into many JARs. Besides that, we may consider to have separate JARs for user manager, file system, configuration implementations.
Thanks, Rana Bhattacharyya --- Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I know that this has been discussed before, but I'll > give it another try. > > I would like to split the code into three > deliverables (JARs): > * FTPlet interfaces > * Server implementation > * GUI > > At least I would like to seperate the GUI from the > rest as it would be > beneficial with a simple executable JAR for the GUI. > Also, the GUI would > usually not be that useful on boxes where the server > would be running > (probably on runlevel 3) but rather on a administers > desktop (but we'll > need remote configuration for that of course). > > I'll be happy to do the work as long as no one > objects. > > /niklas > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
