You're attachments did not get through (Apache mail servers strips
them). Instead, please open a JIRA issue for this problem and attach
them there. I will then attempt to reproduce.

/niklas

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Fred Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> Niklas, David, All,
>
> please find attached the following repro/test harness artifacts
>
>
> ====> FDLeakBase.java
>
> Launch this program with the following command line:
>
>     java test.FDLeak <home-dir> <time-out-in-minutes> <keystore>
> <keystorepassword>
>
> This is a program that starts an embedded FTP/S Server (M2-ish) and an
> embedded FTP/S Client that pounds it with a tight CONN+NLST+DISC loop.
>
> In our Linux *and* Windows environment we have leaks when run on JRE other
> (newer) than 1.5.0_11.
>
> We monitor leaks using "lsof -p <pid> | grep sock" on Linux, and using
> SysInternals processexplorer on Windows.
>
> FWIW on Windows the leak surfaces as a growing number of process EndPoints
> in processexplorer generated dumps, which seem consistent with the symptom
> reported a while ago here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00131.html by
> Gerard Frederic.
>
>
> ====> TestKO.java
>
> Launch this program with the following command line (you should provide a
> selfsigned keystore with related password):
>
>     java -cp . -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=server.jks
> -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=password TestKO
>
> The program will loop over SSLServerSocket createServerSocket()/close() and
> quickly hit the "too many files open" condition very quickly (unless you run
> it on JRE 1.5.0_11).
>
>
> ====> TestOK.java
>
> Launch this program with the following command line (you should provide a
> selfsigned keystore with related password):
>
>     java -cp . -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=server.jks
> -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=password TestOK
>
> This program is functionally equivalent to TestKO, but it's rewritten to use
> just SSLSocket instead of SSLServerSocket.
>
> This proved to be airtight in all 1.5.x 1.6.x JREs we tested.
>
>
> As you see we did not venture into pathing real FTPServer yet.
> Any feedback is appreciated.
> Cheers,
> F.
>
>

Reply via email to