Hmmm, if that's the case, it should be a low priority task for sure. Regards, Sai Pullabhotla
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Sai Pullabhotla > <sai.pullabho...@jmethods.com> wrote: >> I think so. Overall, the idea is pretty cool, but too scary. You >> mentioned that most FTP servers support this feature, but I could find >> any servers highlighting this feature. > > I should not have said "most" since I have not investigated this > myself. The report mentions "some commercial FTP-servers" whatever > that means. > > A quick survey: > IIS: one client per port, recommends using a large enoug range (Sai) > FileZilla: one client per port, recommends using a large enough range > proftpd: one client per port, recommends using a large enough range > WS_FTP: seems to only support one client per port > > So, as mentioned in the issue, open source servers does seem to > support this. Makes me think it might not be such high priority for > us. > > /niklas >
