Also, is it your POC using Pecan? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99069/
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Nick, > if you've got a time for it - I would love to see more formal approach to > the analysis. We know our requirements for Fuel already (we do, right?)), > so I believe we could have a comparison table, with features we need in > rows and frameworks in columns. > You mentioned some of the features already, such as PATCH, > application/json type without monkey-patching, etc. > > If we follow this way and collaboratively feel up such a table, there will > be no question what to take when it comes to finally choose framework and > start development. > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Tomasz Napierala <tnapier...@mirantis.com > > wrote: > >> >> On 20 Aug 2014, at 18:14, Nikolay Markov <nmar...@mirantis.com> wrote: >> >> > Lukasz, >> > >> > I did try this configuration and it was hell. I shared my experience in >> previous letters in this thread. Please don't hesitate to share your >> experience If you have some other thoughts. >> > >> > The thing is, we won't really have much time after 5.1 and before 6.0, >> so all big-size decisions should be done as early as possible. >> >> I agree that it might be too late after release. So maybe we should wait >> until after HCF - most people will have some spare time to do research / >> familiarize themselves with various frameworks. What do you think about it? >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Tomasz Napierala >> Sr. OpenStack Engineer >> tnapier...@mirantis.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> Post to : fuel-dev@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > > > > -- > Mike Scherbakov > #mihgen > > -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : fuel-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp