Hi, I know customers are asking for special network for 'live migrations' and ceph replication. However, that would be nice not to limit architecture to couple of roles and allow the customers to model networking topology on their own.
-- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Sergey Vasilenko <svasile...@mirantis.com> wrote: > I propose following solution. Make multiple network roles (i.e. > storage/ceph/sync, storage/ceph/access) for possibility of divide this > networks. By default those roles may be mapped to the management network. > > /sv > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > Post to : fuel-dev@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : fuel-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
