It was Lynn's choice based on his statement to the press - and it was still his choice no matter what the coercion might have been.
Larry had no right to take take that choice away, and I doubt anyone here has the right nor the first-hand knowledge in order to pass judgement on the reasons for Lynn's choice. Based on Lynn's statements his motivation was patriotic. Who are we to judge that was not his intent for his intellectual property? I ask you, how do you know it wasn't? On 7/29/05, Ron DuFresne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > > > That was a real dickhead thing to do. The guy that wrote that made an > > agreement with Cisco of his own free will. Who do you think you are > > to go against an agreement he made, with his own information? > > > > I sincerely hope it bites you in the arse. > > > > Was it free will, or the threat of jail and other difficulties? > > Afterall, employment was not a show stopper for him, he quit to release > his findings and gain glory in the crowds at hacker fests. so was it > really free will I ask again? > > Thanks, > > Ron DuFresne > -- > "Sometimes you get the blues because your baby leaves you. Sometimes you > get'em > 'cause she comes back." --B.B. King > ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!*** > > OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything. > > > -- ME2 <http://www.santeriasys.net/> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
