Hmmm. Is this the same Yahoo! that also isn't aware that they are unwittingly hosting hundreds of phishing sites?
http://news.com.com/Spamhaus+Yahoo+major+phishing+site+host/2100-1029_3-5850773.html - ferg -- n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/14/05, James Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the extremety of my blunt response, but I have two things to say: > > 1. How the fuck do YOU know any more than they do? Just because you > obsess over the security factors around a company with which you have > no affiliation does not put you in any greater authority to make > statements like those you made there. I heard it from the horses mouth. Yahoo don't acknowledge the same stats that IMLogic report on, and Yahoo say IMLogic's findings don't match that of Yahoo's own stats of their network. IMLogic can report on something and claim a worm is attacking, but when Yahoo's people go and look at their network, nothing is actually taking place! How many malicious messages do IMLogic record, before they decide theres a wide spread attack? Thats my question, because even with reports of worms on Yahoo, none have been seen by Yahoo or users.. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
