Hey;

Do you guys know





On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Send Full-Disclosure mailing list submissions to
        full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Full-Disclosure digest..."


Note to digest recipients - when replying to digest posts, please trim your 
post appropriately. Thank you.


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling furtherbehind
     (Valdis Shkesters)
  2. Re: Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling furtherbehind
     (Nick FitzGerald)
  3. Trend Micro's Response to the Magic Byte Bug (Auri Rahimzadeh)
  4. Re: Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind
     (Nick FitzGerald)
  5. Re: phpBB 2.0.17 (and other BB systems as well) Cookie
     disclosure exploit. (Paul Laudanski)
  6. Funny smtp helo in the logs (Aditya Deshmukh)
  7. Re: Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling furtherbehind
     (Valdis Shkesters)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:15:17 +0300
From: "Valdis Shkesters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling
        furtherbehind
To: "wilder_jeff Wilder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-4";
        reply-type=response

Hi,

At first you can take look here http://secunia.com/product/4256/.

This summer German magazine ComputerBild compared several
popular antispyware products. Test results are available in the forum
http://www.rokop-security.de/lofiversion/index.php/t8810.html.
Scrolling through detailed figures by categories of harmful programs
can be seen. I warn that the figures may be very unpleasant for fans
of some products.

Best regards,

Valdis

----- Original Message -----
From: "wilder_jeff Wilder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling
furtherbehind


All,

I am messing around with Webroot's spysweeper product... does anyone know
if there has been any issues or holes discovered in it?

-Jeff Wilder
CISSP,CCE,C/EH



-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
 Version: 3.1
GIT/CM/CS/O d- s:+ a C+++ UH++ P L++ E- w-- N+++ o-- K- w O- M--
V-- PS+ PE- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5- X-- R* tv b++ DI++ D++
G e* h--- r- y+++*
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:42:02 +1300
From: Nick FitzGerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling
        furtherbehind
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Valdis Shkesters wrote:

At first you can take look here http://secunia.com/product/4256/.

This summer German magazine ComputerBild compared several
popular antispyware products. Test results are available in the forum
http://www.rokop-security.de/lofiversion/index.php/t8810.html.
Scrolling through detailed figures by categories of harmful programs
can be seen. I warn that the figures may be very unpleasant for fans
of some products.

...which may simply reflect that they are shite tests, rather than
anything especially meaningful about the products??

As a rule, "anti-spyware" products fall into one of two camps:

1.  "Never mind the quality, feel the width" -- you can usually pick
these because their advertising lays heavy stress on the 43 quadrillion
spyware items they claim to detect.  These products will remove 17
bazillion entirely harmless items from "normal" systems simply because
they happended to be string-matches on filename ("of course you don't
want ANY 'unwise.exe' files on your system!"), reg key/value/etc, and
so on.

2.  Cluefull.  These will not have the stupid false-positive rates of
the above, but as a result will not apparently score as well on
clueless tests of the kind the proponents of the first kind of anti-
spyware product push.

I'd like to say -- stealing something from a colleague -- "welcome to
antivirus 101" but actually, I think things in the anti-spyware testing
arena are a lot worse than all but the very, very, very worst ever AV
tests AND it seems anti-spyware tests will continue to get worse,
rather than better...




--
Kevin Wood ,CISSP
MSBIT Security
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Url: www.msbits.com

IT Security Solutions for small and medium size companies...
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to