On 11/16/05, Barrie Dempster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Are we forgetting slammer ? A worm that attacked a product which you > would expect to be used in a similar way. > > Backend or not, the system should be patched, being backend is not a > justifiable reason for not patching the system. [...] > Believing this would be a very narrow view of security and we > all know security is far from something to be viewed like that. [...]
You are totally right. In fact I was (or better - I *tried* to be...) ironical about it... that's their philosophy: on 8.1.x you are 4 versions behind their actual off-the-shelf product - which, as we said, "never breaks" so, of course, why not upgrade?... (and pay the licensing fees) Cheers -- Marco Ermini Dubium sapientiae initium. (Descartes) [EMAIL PROTECTED] # mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research (This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
