On 11/24/05, InfoSecBOFH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bottom line is... and you can ignore the SANS instructor/SANS zealot post... > > SANS = SHIT. > > Now that I am in a position with my employer to hire and fire > people... I will not even consider an applicant who touts his SANS > certification as something to be proud of or something to make him > more skilled than the next.
You should apply that to ANY certification... IMHO [...] > You know what makes me smile everyday... the knowledge in knowing that > I am not the only senior infosec person at a major corporation who > feels this way about SANS. > > Fuck SANS. FUCK EM ALL! [...] While I don't have any clue about SANS, I think that mileage may vary for everything and truth is never just on one side (or if you prefer, the world is not just black and white and there are shades of grey... you got it). So I tend to not listen to "extreme" opinions about almost anything. You must admit that your way of expressing disagreement about SANS work did not help itself to be considered a pondered and well founded opinion... Cheers -- Marco Ermini Dubium sapientiae initium. (Descartes) [EMAIL PROTECTED] # mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research (This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
