What about a entirely separate Full-Disclosure-Admins list? What I'm suggesting is that the current maintainer of the list picks say 10 or 20 people to add to the new list and on there issues like this get discussed, and between the so-called admins, they come to a decision based on whether or not to ban the person, warn then, etc, etc.
The new list should be comprised of maybe some of the longest standing FD posters, or anyone else that the admin feels is fitting. This way it will take this stuff of the main list? xyberpix On Fri Dec 16 11:54 , 'Randall M' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > > > >::::-----Original Message----- >::::From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >::::[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >::::Behalf Of Todd Towles >::::Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM >::::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >::::full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk >::::Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Moderated lists >:::: >::::> Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines of >::::> keeping track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo >::::> starts spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only >::::members older >::::> then xyz date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user >::::> banned, then so be it... >:::: >::::Then 5 mins later the user is back..using a proxy to sign >::::up another address... >:::: >::::-Todd >::::_______________________________________________ > >And from there the list fills up with "hey vote this guy off" and voting >emails. > >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
