It comes back to ignorance of the law is no excuse. So depending on the Lawyers, and the judges and possible jury you are either boned or get a slight slap and are told do not do it again!
-- Lhe On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 14:14 -0500, bkfsec wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:04:43 CST, Leif Ericksen said: > > > > > >>There are those laws that are direct and clear cut, and there are the > >>ones that takes an act of congress to decide what is legal or not. ;) > >> > >> > > > >And then there are those you're not allowed to even *see*. In Gilmore v. > >Ashcroft, > >the Department of Justice finally consented to allow a *judge* with a > >security > >clearance to see the text of the law, but Gilmore and his attorneys are still > >denied access to what the law says. > > > > > > Which begs the question... How do you break a law that you don't know > exists? > > How can one be expected not to break the law if the law is never made > available? > > -bkfsec > > -- Leif Ericksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
