On 1/13/06, Todd Towles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stan wrote: > > Ordinarily I'd argue, but its hard to when we find out > > Microsoft knew about the bug for a long time and made a > > concious decision not to patch it even though they knew it > > could lead to a system compromise. > > Concious decision? So you are in the Microsoft meetings? Do > tell...didn't think so. They may have known about it, but many huge
Do you often ask and answer your own questions? > companies have security problems in their software..some are so embedded > in the system or related to how the program work..that they will do > anything to protect it. > Why talk about hypotheticals when the thread is about the real thing? > Why didn't this get thrown up with the Cisco/Lynn outcry? Oh...because Yeah cause Cisco has lots to do with SetAbortProc... > hitting on Microsoft gets you more attention perhaps... > Yeah cause threads like this really open peoples eyes... Don't get thrown off your high horse now, sb > -Todd > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
