On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:49:45 EST, Tim said:

> The issue brought up has to do with authentication, not encryption.
> Authentication has to be good, or else encryption is 100% worthless.

Actually, encryption can do some good, even in the absence of authentication.

Even if the remote end is totally unauthenticated, you have at least guaranteed
that nobody is doing any passive sniffing of the content in transit.  You've
at least forced an attacker to mount an active MitM attack, which is both more
challenging and has a higher risk of detection....

Attachment: pgpDJdcK8OkTE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to