It isn't security threat, it is a misuse of our legal system, an unfair bias towards the mother. Justice is allegedly impartial, but not in this case.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:41 PM To: zap zoid Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Court Order May Violate First Amendment On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:08:56 PST, zap zoid said: > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,189406,00.html *yawn* If this violates the First Amendment, so does every single gag order issued by a judge, prohibiting the people involved from discussing the case. > Anybody else following this story? Thoughts? Is this a security threat > to the United States? He screwed her, she had a kid. They fought about who got the kid. He lost, and trash-talked the mom and the family court judges involved. The people who got trash-talked are trying to get the trash-talking stopped. He turns around, and trash-talks the way they're trying to get the first round of trash-talking stopped. I'm well-known as a member of the tinfoil-helmet brigade, but even *I* am having a problem seeing how this poses a security threat. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
