Why don't you just "filter" me like "the experts" have told you to do? Or haven't you worked out the technical background architecture of Outlook and Thunderbird yet? Figures.

On 3/31/06, php0t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For real, please keep your word.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:55 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY

This is funny as well, http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID=131539&start=-1&reply=true  I almost choked on my big mac after reading this one, the guy thinks if you take down a site, the phisher's script doesn't deploy another premade site straight away on another host. lol, maybe the RSA have miscalculated the pre plainning and programming of a phishing attack backend before its carried out. I guess they just thought phishing was down to "dumb criminals".

On 3/31/06, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check out this article, and I really did spill my hard earned Starbucks right down my front when I looked at this article:

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to