On 01 Dec 2006 09:36:58 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote: > >>>>> "Dude" == Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dude> On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz > <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote: > >> > >> If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but > >> certainly isn't referencable in the 49 other states. > > Dude> actually, it is. it is called legal precedence > > It wasn't clear from your posting that you were talking about a federal case.
well try reading the material I reference before saying that anyone who listens to me is a fool next time plz. > In that case, yes, it's caselaw. However, if it was just Georgia state law, > that would *not* create case law for any other state. > > By the way, "caselaw" and "legal precedent" are the same. thanks for the info, i learned something new today, which makes it a good day. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
