Dear Tim Brown,
--Friday, May 4, 2007, 1:50:40 AM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TB> On Thursday 03 May 2007 22:13:15 3APA3A wrote: >> This vulnerability for D-Link DSL-G624T was already reported by Jose >> Ramon Palanco. See >> >> http://securityvulns.ru/Odocument816.html >> TB> However, TB> as I also point out in the Solutions section, all of the issues you list were TB> against major version 1 of the firmware. We're now at major version 3 and TB> directory traversal is still a problem. Not exactly, read first link carefully: Tested on D-Link DSL-G624T Version: Firmware Version : V3.00B01T01.YA-C.20060616 Discovered by: Jose Ramon Palanco: jose.palanco(at)eazel(dot).es These firmware date is even newer than yours :) TB> Secondly, the Javascript injection issue describe is as far as I TB> know /entirely new/. It's not a short walk to the point where these two TB> issues alone could be use to compromise devices, irrespective of the firmware TB> issues you also link to. Jose mentions both directory traversal and 3 examples of crossite scripting. Crossite scripting examples are different from yours though and require POST request. Your CSS is easier to exploit. TB> Maybe, I'm hoping that by version 10 of the firmware in the year 2014, D-Link TB> may actually manage to fix some of these reported problems? Moreover, maybe TB> they'll actually make it possible for researchers to report these things in a TB> manner whereby they actually respond to the reports when contacted. Not TB> holding my breath though. In fact, at least Russian D-Link support is very responsive to any bug report, but it seems like only way to get a response is to post a problem on their forum. -- ~/ZARAZA http://securityvulns.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
