One thing is proved here: I had a great estimation about all these security conferences but looks like some of them are even bigger morons like Aditya who are not able to distiguish a lame ass from a security guy. I will not be surprised that in future we will have people like Aditya and n3td3v will be speakers at such conferences and people would spend $$$$ to attend it.
On 9/9/07, LSNN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MR. LAME ASS OF THE MONTH RELEASES NEW MATERIALS > > The lame ass of the month, Aditya K Sood has released two documents of > the talks he delivered on Xfocus Xcon conference and OWASP Live 0 > conference day. [1.1] The security community has usually found Aditya > K Sood's documents to be lame and useless. Aditya K Sood also does not > occur in any security list where vulnerabilities are verified before > pusblishing. [1.2] OSVDB/CVE has a policy of tagging such > vulnerabilities as Myth/Fake but they have ignored Aditya because they > believe the vulnerabilities to be so lame that it can not create any > potential confusion. [1.3] Finally, some frustrated soul in Full > Disclosure awarded Aditya K Sood with the title of "Lame Ass of the > Month". [1.4] Since then, Aditya seems to have been on a self-imposed > exile from full disclosure. > > [1.1] http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/2007-09/msg00032.html > [1.2] > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-August/065295.html > [1.3] > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-August/065296.html > [1.4] > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-September/065573.html > > > A VULNERABILITY FOUND IN FULL DISCLOSURE MAILING LIST > > A vulnerability very common in many unmoderated forums also affects > Full Disclosure mailing list. Any troll (like us) can can set rolling > a long and winding discussion on lame topics which increases the SNR > (signal to noise ratio) of the forum. A very recent example is the > thread with the subject "Came across this site" [2.1] posted by Scott. > Fortunately, Shyaam pointed out that it was a "Useless thread once > again".The lame thread still got 4 lame replies. > > This vulnerability is common in many unmoderated forums. There are > many open source project forums which are known to be less affected by > this vulnerability because in such forums the users and programmers > are driven by a common goal, sense of responsibility and common-sense. > > [2.1] > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-September/065664.html > > ----- > We are Lame Security News Network (LSNN) > If you believe in a free and open news service for security researchers, > please volunteer by sending us lame news and articles on security. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/