[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But a "0 day vulnerability" is meaningless as a definition; it applies to > a vulnerability for exactly 24 hours and then is meaningless. ALL > vulnerabilities were discovered at some point and had their 24 hours of > "0 day fame" by your definition. It just does not make sense. > > Casper >
Should we now create a new term for the industry +0day or 1day. How about? nowaday -- ==================================================== J. Oquendo "Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta" http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E sil . infiltrated @ net http://www.infiltrated.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
