On Dec 15, 2007 2:51 PM, coderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... "I don't think this is a timing attack; it's a side-channel > attack that exploits the fact that OpenSSL's impact on the branch > prediction cache leaks information."
someone says to me, "Branch Prediction Analysis side channel attacks are not traditional timing attacks". sure, not _traditional_ timing attack. active interference for targeted misses gives much more key than traditional passive timing. but this is still a timing attack, even if one much more effective than most. someone is now informed. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
