SecReview wrote:
Nate, Your email was constructive and much appreciated. We'll go over the review a second time and incorporate some of your suggestions. Thank you for taking the time to provide so much good feedback.
Hey all, I'd like to get into reviewing security companies as well. Before I do though I'd appreciate it if someone could provide me with information on the differences betweens statistical sampling over judgmental sampling. I wouldn't want to write a review thatcould affect someone's livelihood without knowing what the differences are between say change management and mitigation management.
And to the older security folks on the list keeping quiet (not those between the ages of tenteen and 19):
eW91IGNhbiBwYXkgdXMgdG8gd2hvcmUgeW91ciBjb21wYW55Cg== Cheap too! -- ==================================================== J. Oquendo SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1) SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1) wget -qO - www.infiltrated.net/sig|perl http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
