Salut, Roger, On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:30:35 -0500, Roger A. Grimes wrote: > As somewhat indicated in the paper itself, these types of physical > DMA attacks are possible against any PC-based OS, not just Windows. > If that's true, why is the paper titled around Windows Vista?
That's very easy: because the specific attack was against Windows
Vista's activation mechanism.
The deficiencies of Firewire with regard to direct memory access have
been known for quite a while now. The purpose of the referenced attack
was specific to Windows Vista. It is of course also possible though to
steal GnuPG keys from the memory of a Solaris machine, of course,
that's in the nature of the beast, but this is not relevant to the
specific attack mentioned here.
May I also add that I am actually aware of patches from vendors which
can render this attack ineffective for most other OSes (Solaris, Linux,
etc.) - as far as I know, though, there is no such patch for Windows?
That might also be a reason why this attack was created and published
in the first place - like I said, the attack vector has been known for
ages now.
> [Disclaimer: I'm a full-time Microsoft employee.]
Hi there. ;-)
Tonnerre
--
SyGroup GmbH
Tonnerre Lombard
Solutions Systematiques
Tel:+41 61 333 80 33 Güterstrasse 86
Fax:+41 61 383 14 67 4053 Basel
Web:www.sygroup.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
