Nah, there are a number of blogs and non-Western sources that are providing much the same information. Check out the English Al-Jazeera site for examples. Hardly a news source that is 'friendly' to Western interests, and definitely not a puppet like Fox or similar. There are also a number of video's up on Youtube.
-- Tremaine Lea Network Security Consultant Intrepid ACL "Paranoia for hire" On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 08:57 -0400, Kern wrote: > >Jerome, I find it odd that you would tell someone to ignore a media > >source and then not provide an alternative. > > I think the "alternative" sources of "media" are in Chinese. > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Tremaine Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jerome, I find it odd that you would tell someone to ignore a media > > source and then not provide an alternative. > > > > While there are plenty of reasons, and good reasons, to be suspicious of > > western media, the facts speak for themselves. > > > > - There was violence in Tibet and a lot of protesters died. > > > > - The Chinese government said they did send in security forces but they > > didn't kill anyone and their forces weren't even armed. > > > > - Independent sources in Tibet, which are remarkably hard to find right > > now, managed to get information out. > > > > - The Chinese government fesses up days letter and says yes they killed > > people, and yes their security forces were armed. > > > > Just what is it you were trying to refute with this post to the list? > > > > -- > > Tremaine Lea > > Network Security Consultant > > Intrepid ACL > > "Paranoia for hire" > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 13:31 +0800, Jerome Jar wrote: > > > Please, I humbly think that you know possibly nothing about Tibet, the > > > province of China. > > > > > > A lot of Chinese people, who used to take western medias as the > > > representation of good will and perhaps democracy, do feel sick of the > > > misleading news article pieces produced by such medias on this very > > > topic of Tibet. If all of your knowledge about the Tibet event comes > > > from such sources, just ignore them. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gerald Maggro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ..with purchase of one country of equal or greater value? > > > > > > > > Seriously though, those cocksuckers in the Chinese gov't are at it > > > > again... wait, they never stopped. Murderous freedom hating ways. Just > > > > not right. > > > > > > > > How about a bigger target than Scientology this time? > > > > > > > > China's got the Olympics coming up, that makes them more sensitive > > than > > > > usual. > > > > > > > > The Dalai Lama can be as peaceful as he wants... more action is > > needed. > > > > Alot more. Anyone want to pick a fight with the Chinese? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
