I'm sorry, but I think you misunderstood part of my post. What I meant was that the USA is a rogue nation, just like other so-called "rogue nations," and is causing the UN to lose its effectiveness.
I don't doubt that what the USA has done to Cuba is pointless, ineffective, and strategically wrong. -- Razi On 3/27/08, b. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the Junk mail ( not related 2 security ) > But > this made me laugh a lot > rogue/clean nations > and USA as a respectfull ONU member > Cuba blocus is condemned for 14 years, each years, by the general > assembly @ ONU, > On the ONU thema, please read *Hans-Christof von Sponeck book > "*/A different war : The UN sanctions regime in Irak" > /And be a little more subtle/ > / > > > Razi Shaban a écrit : > > > Touche. > > > > Now a question. Is the USA a member of the UN? Okay. And was Iraq a > > member of the UN? Okay. So both nations agreed to subject themselves > > to the UN mandate, which implies recognition. > > > > In order for the UN to effectively work, the participation of all > > nations is a must. When you have rogue nations such as Libya, North > > Korea, and the USA, thats when the UN begins to appear defunct. > > > > -- > > Razi > > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
