n3td3v wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:44 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think this the most worst and alarming situation ..where SANS like >> organization is doing the way.......... from onwards no body will report >> info to SANS........... E+1 t+1 b+1 j+1 it OFF!!! > > SANS hasn't admitted a breach occured yet and they've had 7 days to > come up with the wording. > > I haven't seen Joel Esler, the guy who breached my privacy back on > duty yet, but i've seen him and Johannes Ullrich talking on the > internet storm center mentioning podcasts > http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=4202 > > Why are they announcing podcasts when both Joel Esler and Johannes > Ullrich have a privacy breach still to publically acknowledge and > apologize for? > > Maybe they thought Full-Disclosure mailing list members wouldn't > notice if they pretend the incident didn't take place and tried to > sweep it under the carpet? > > Johannes Ullrich, you told me you were investigating Joel Esler > internally, so please tell me the findings, so I can paste them onto > Full-Disclosure. >
I fail to see why I should care. I might care if they provided name, address, phone, parents but that would only be because I could then send you annoying things in postal mail every time I get another crap email from you. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/