Valdis, Furthermore, using scholarly resource WikiPedia, I have been able to find more flaw in your statement. As it turns out, the jews actually *are* a small subset:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population That is small dude! LOLOL. Now, we both have accepted that any set is a subset of itself, it is now proven that jews are a small subset of jews. QED AKA LOLOL. J On Fri, 09 May 2008 19:41:18 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Fri, 09 May 2008 19:38:24 EDT, Joey Mengele said: >> Also, I got this for you Valdis, scholarly source WikiPedia to >> teach you about set theory since you went through all that >trouble >> to read 9 RFCs for me: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subset >> >> "Any set is a subset of itself, but not a proper subset." - >> WikiPedia >> >> You see, jews are a subset of jews. LOLOLOL, check your work! > >You need to read more carefully. I didn't say "jews" wasn't a >subset of itself, >I said that "jews" wasn't a *SMALL* subset of itself the way >"islamic >fascists" is a small (possibly empty) subset of "muslims". -- Click to find the latest solutions to enhance your small business. http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4eDJdVO4MMMaVuY4qK6Ndkh410rG2uFwEDxwpeZzYx3OdTdu/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
