it's unfortunate that the US government is debating such issues instead of real things!
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:15 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If Marcus Sachs can convince the white house to treat hackers as part > of the "war on terror", it means he and his agenda gets priority > funding, thats whats going on right now. > > The only problem is, this is a cheat and a lie is what he is doing > just to get cyber security put into the "war on terror" category. > > In its natural state, cyber security is nothing to do with the "war on > terror", but thats how this new dodgy dossier coming out in November > is going to sell it to the next administration as it is coming in and > 100 days after. > > Should we allow Marcus Sachs to put hackers into the "war on terror" > category, just for the sake of the extra $100 million, ontop of the > $30 million he's already managed to swindle? > > He is taking advantage of a funding system, and frauding the > government by making them think, shit sachs is right, let's give this > shit the "war on terror" category funding it deserves! > > Its a shame the government don't know to come onto the mailing lists > and find out everyone is 'lol'ing' at sachs and realize he's cheating > the system, the tax payer, the government and every other person under > the sun of out money! > > What uncle sam doesn't know won't hurt them about sachs I guess. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > -- http://www.goldwatches.com/ http://www.jewelerslounge.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
