On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:33:19 +0400, Razi Shaban said: > Yes, they're including a remote javascript. Then again, tens if not > hundreds of thousands of other websites include the very same script. > If statcounter's servers aren't very secure, they would have already > been compromised.
One would *hope* that a major country's spook agencies kept themselves to a *slightly* higher security standard than Sixpack Joe's Website and Bait-n-Tackle Emporium. The risk/benefit analysis for the average .com and the average .spook are a bit different. > On the other hand, look at the voting machines the US gov't has > contracted. They have a tendency to screw up with technology, making > this one of their lesser problems (if you want to consider it a > problem at all). A totally separate problem, but one that's not in DIA's jurisdiction.
pgpKwt8B5bdbG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
