pot kettle black On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:34 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're like a shite that won't flush away. > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> all speculation: >> >> no 1 knows 4 sure. >> >> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss >> >> http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ >> >> http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm >> >> c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article >> w/out stealing ppls work. >> >> pay attention. >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>> u arent getting it. >>>> >>>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual >>>> backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can >>>> acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has >>>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any >>>> system, patched or not. pay attention. >>> >>> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored >>> here. The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms >>> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files >>> available through P2P to full remote system access. >>> >>> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other >>> than this statement? >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
