On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Gary Wilson <dra...@dragons.org.uk> wrote: > > Having had enough of the non-topic junk this list has become recently, I > went to unsub, but it seems the SSL cert is not valid/trusted. > > For the mods, I guess: > > Secure Connection Failed > > lists.grok.org.uk uses an invalid security certificate. > > The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. > > (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) > > > * This could be a problem with the server's configuration, or it could > be someone trying to impersonate the server. > > * If you have connected to this server successfully in the past, the > error may be temporary, and you can try again later. > > -- > GW > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
Alright, enough of the off-topic crap. Back to the topic, being that lists.grok.co.uk should get a non-self-signed cert. The cancer infesting fd and the merits of CAs are irrelevant to the thread. kthnxbai _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
