> > > I'll clarify for everyone since you seem lost. > EVERYONE, THE NULL POINTER DOES NOT GET DEREFERENCED. It only > gets referenced. And Jubei isn't even sure a null pointer is involved > at all =) > > With that out of the way, I'd just like to say that I only meant to > encourage people to check out an excellent paper. I didn't mean to say > anything related to your argument other than to say that that > paper is a must-read. If you can't appreciate that, why the fuck are you > on F-D? Think about it. > > > I'm didn't even comment on Mark's paper, it is definitely a great piece of research, there is no doubt. It's just that some people have read this paper and thought, wow, all those NULL bugs are now exploitable. It's important to separate these bug classes.
I'd even go to say that while this paper is a must-read, please also spend some time understanding it, otherwise don't bother. -- ciao JT
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
