just another evidence: http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/01/sourceforge-entry-point-seems-still.html
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, wac <waldoalvare...@gmail.com> wrote: > So it actually happened! Not surprising at all. I suspected at first > sight about a phish attempt because the email in another domain they > sent for contact in case of problems with password reset (didn't > bothered about headers anyway). > > Seems mine was not compromised according to what they say "Our > analysis uncovered (among other things) a hacked SSH daemon, which was > modified to do password capture." > > If i were them I would reinstall from scratch at least all SSH > servers. They all could be compromised! > > On 1/30/11, exploit dev <extraexpl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sourceforge has reported a full report of attack. Seems very close to > what I > > wrote in previous messages and reported in my blog posts related to this > > thread. > > > > Sourceforge Attack: Full Report > > http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-attack-full-report/ > > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:18 PM, exploit dev <extraexpl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> just a reminder: this breach was used by php/python/perl script for get > >> and > >> save on user directory bot and remote shell. Also you could, as reported > >> also in owned and exposed zine, launch commands and attempt privilege > >> escalation. So I'm not so sure that this is not so writable as well i > >> think > >> is not right sayd that is not critical. > >> > >> Regards-. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Farmer <andf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 2011-01-24, at 12:08, exploit dev wrote: > >>> > Anyway, I'm sorry repeat my message. I think that this issue is a bit > >>> > critical but I don't receive still any feedback, > >>> > >>> It's not particularly critical by any means. SourceForge projects all > >>> have > >>> their own web space, and there are doubtless a bunch of them running > >>> vulnerable versions of software. These sites are relatively isolated, > and > >>> don't have write access to the project's SCM or downloads. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://extraexploit.blogspot.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > http://extraexploit.blogspot.com > > > -- http://extraexploit.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/