No, it was you that made suggestions that you potentially did work for the
government.

I cba to argue with your trolling any more dude, go suck a cock :)

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, andrew.wallace <
andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
> cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
> > I bet you never even used the term "local authority" until I posted it
> just
> > then lol.
> > As for 'central government organisation' in Cheltenham, you are most
> > likely referring to GCHQ and/or the new department that was branched off
> > from it to deal with cyber crime. If this is the case, then you are going
> to
> > be taught a very serious lesson from one of the risk assessment officers.
> > Even hinting that you have involvements with GCHQ outside of you duties
> > (unless you are an MP making a public statement), is grounds to have your
> > employment/contract suspended and/or terminated.
> > Seriously mate, I know the score when it comes to this area, and I don't
> > even for a second the bullshit you are peddling.
>
> I don't have involvement with them, it was "James Rankin" who was claiming
> to work for the government. However, he hasn't heard of me and I haven't
> heard of him. So its likely he is the one feeding both of us with fairy tale
> stories about his position in government.
>
> Andrew
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to