On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Pete Smith <secli...@decapitate.us> wrote: > On 9 March 2011 11:13, Ryan Sears <rdse...@mtu.edu> wrote: >> >> I agree, in order for it to qualify as 'free' it needs to be just that. >> >> Forcing someone to make a 'donation' before you give them said free >> software is SELLING that software. Saying it's free is not just misleading, >> it's a blatantly *not* true. >> >> Juan did however give me a download to test it out when I contacted him >> off-list, which was nice of him, but I don't think that these announcements >> should say 'free with a donation from 20$ up'. It should state that you HAVE >> to pay 20$ in order to get a download. Anything else is misleading. >> >> Also due to the fact that this is *not* open-source I did not try it out. >> Just too many red flags for me. >> I like the Live Chat Support - Offline.....
Jeff _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
