On 14 March 2011 17:24, bk <cho...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mar 14, 2011, at 10:04 AM, imipak wrote:
>
> On 14/03/11 16:51, bk wrote:
>
> >> The point you missed is that almost all the examples we've seen so far
> have
> >> been closer to espionage than to actual warfare.
>
> [...]
>
> > Despite that, I agree.  Espionage != War.  People hyping "cyberwar" are
> either trying
> > to increase their sales, budget, or jurisdiction.
> >
>
>
> "Report: Iran's paramilitary launches cyber attack"
>
>
> http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jlwiVKEhlj8CjRz6dzR-McTlnRHw
>
> -i
>
>
> Yes, let's put a lot of stock in propaganda that amounts to "we're in ur
> hostin providerz, defacin ur websitez."
>
> This is from the same regime that photoshopped in extra missiles to make
> their capabilities look stronger.
>
> Grow up.
>
>


*cough*

http://blogs.comodo.com/it-security/data-security/the-recent-ca-compromise/


-i
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to