On 14 March 2011 17:24, bk <cho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2011, at 10:04 AM, imipak wrote: > > On 14/03/11 16:51, bk wrote: > > >> The point you missed is that almost all the examples we've seen so far > have > >> been closer to espionage than to actual warfare. > > [...] > > > Despite that, I agree. Espionage != War. People hyping "cyberwar" are > either trying > > to increase their sales, budget, or jurisdiction. > > > > > "Report: Iran's paramilitary launches cyber attack" > > > http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jlwiVKEhlj8CjRz6dzR-McTlnRHw > > -i > > > Yes, let's put a lot of stock in propaganda that amounts to "we're in ur > hostin providerz, defacin ur websitez." > > This is from the same regime that photoshopped in extra missiles to make > their capabilities look stronger. > > Grow up. > >
*cough* http://blogs.comodo.com/it-security/data-security/the-recent-ca-compromise/ -i
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/