On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:03:17AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-08-31 20:37, Packet Storm wrote:
> > Is this supposed to be DSA-2201-1 and not DSA-2200-1?
> >
> > DSA-2200-1 already exists as an Iceweasel advisory..
> 
> You would really expect DSA-2299 to be followed by DSA-2300, but
> apparently there was an overflow. ;)

You should see:

http://testing-security.debian.net/
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-testing/data/DSA/list?revision=17150&view=markup

DSA "process" is quite open for everyone interested.

Best regards,
Henri Salo

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to