Attrition stopped making their lists of defaced sites years ago, and it was pretty damn accurate - it was *kind* of like a Zone-H of sorts. (I quite like Attrition).
Sony incident is interesting, how badly they handled it. They should have just fessed up right away, and apologised, bringing network back online ASAP rather than piss off people as much. However, it did not affect them too bad in the end. On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:17 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:25:20 +0900, Robert Kim App and Facebook Marketing > said: > > Guys... i can't stand sites like Attrition > > it's all based on total heresay and feed off mob stupidity. AND it ruins > > perfectly good reputations. > > OK, I'll bite. What percent of Attrition listings are of sites that didn;t > actually > get hacked? (Serious question there - I've never actually done a check of > their > accuracy. Anybody got numbers to back up Robert's claim?) > > And I'm not sure that an Attrition listing is sufficient to ruin a good > reputation. > Heck, Sony won a Pwnie Award and it didn't do squat to their stock price. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
