Here , i would have doneso initially, but was not sure if / whatt you have done to maybe pissoff the bosses of the list :P So im doing this blindly, with faith in just the right to speech, and nothing more in mind. I hope i dont get 500 links of threads about you, or your posts, and i hope i dont see 500 posts, wich are all shitty :P this is, merely my opinion on freedom to speak, and sofarm, seen no malice, although i see many others, do see malice to yowards you, wich is, unusual for *no reason*, so, this is asking the list "what did n3td3v do, exactly* that got him banned :s I wont diagree with it, but id like to know why... lol. cheers. xd
On 14 October 2011 12:13, andrew.wallace <andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com>wrote: > Why not post your opinion to the mailing list? It may make a difference. > > Andrew > > ------------------------------ > *From:* xD 0x41 <sec...@gmail.com> > *To:* andrew.wallace <andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2011 2:08 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] Possible German Governmental Backdoor > found ("R2D2") > > I find that stinks.. nomatter who or what dislikes you... unless you > clearly did harm or attack people in ways that, could not be combatted but, > by stopping you from *bragging* it, then id see maybe reason for it... but > on an apprently FD list i would not expect this type of behavious and from > the little of you that i do know, i still see no malicious intent.. in any > communications and some of it, was me totally trashing you... but, i still > saw you doing me no harm, nor to my websites, etc etc.. so, i see no reason > why your banned, i think it sucks, and im sure many people who believe in > civil liberties and simply having a right to speech, but then, if you have > pissed someone who is in charge off, and, your in UK, the moderators maybe > not in uk, i dont know but, somehow you got yaself banned and, i find it > weird that, coz, many people are speaking to you and posting for you.. so, i > find it is abit strange, id just like to see a *why* i guess. This would > apply to anyone on this list, and, even adam the papsy :sp and cristian the > geek ;p lol... joking joking :Pm no, i mean it, cristian you look like a > frigging geek. unfortunaetyly, but, you speak some ok things, when it is not > coming thru the anus :) > anyhow, cheers. > xd > > > On 14 October 2011 11:51, andrew.wallace <andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com>wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:38 AM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > > To clarify: the list itself is (to the best of my knowledge), in fact > *not* > > moderated, which involves somebody actually looking at all postings and > doing a yes/ > > no check on the enclosed content. > > > > That is *different* from *certain user addresses* being set to permanent > > moderation status. > > > > There's unfortunately some people that are still fuzzy on the difference, > and > > some that insist on conflating the two. > > > > https://www.gnu.org/s/mailman/mailman-admin/node22.html > > > > tl;dr: No, the list isn't moderated, Andrew is (and other individuals may > or > > may not be at any given time). > > I'm not moderated, I was completely brick walled. I rely on the industry to > post my stuff on my behalf. > > Andrew > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/