Except that they weren't obviously unarmed.

Not only where they not obviously unarmed, they appeared to be armed.

Look at the 4 minute mark.

That sure as shit looks like an RPG.

The crew thought the group was armed.  Ergo, they were cleared to engage.

This wasn't a war crime...and the allegation that it was just makes
people look ridiculous.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:05 PM,  <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:44:44 PDT, Mike Hale said:
>> Seriously!  Think about the injustice of having American helicopters
>> engage armed individuals shadowing American soldiers.
>
> Shooting at "armed individuals" is one thing.  If it's "civilians and Reuters
> employees" who *aren't* obviously armed, it's something else.
>
>



-- 
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to