I have no doubt that a lot of things are lost on you. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:23 PM, xD 0x41 <sec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> are you braindead ? > your humor, is really lost on me..so, i think, look within :P > > > On 12 November 2011 04:01, Mario Vilas <mvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit. > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I > >> was thinking at least. > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <sec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, > 49days > >> >> to send a packet, my butt. > >> >> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with > >> >> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only > >> >> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger > >> >> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like > >> >> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... > >> >> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src > >> >> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to > >> >> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open > >> >> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the > goal > >> >> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , > >> >> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 > >> >> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered > with > >> >> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one > thing, > >> >> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another.. > >> > > >> > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either > >> > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know > >> > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from > >> > what I can make of your writing). > >> > > >> > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you > >> > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > >> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > > > > > -- > > “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights > the enemy > > of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military > > becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.” > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > -- “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights the enemy of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/