Granted, but I know that vulnerability research can take a huge chunk of time out of a person's life, and without getting in to "monetary philosophy", I feel that in our current system, a person should be compensated for their time if they've done something useful for society. That's sort of the point of the way we use money.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Pablo Ximenes <pa...@ximen.es> wrote: > I think the reward is intended as a symbolic token of appreciation, and not > as compensation. That's why they give you the option to donate your cash > reward instead of keeping the money. I think what really drives researchers > into Google's program is recognition and not compensation, IMHO. > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
