My point being, a degree in computer science should reflect the student's ability in computer science - not compliance with some arbirary moral compass dreamt up in a university board somewhere.
Who gave these university beaurocrats the power to exclude this young person from the education system? Why is their moral compass deemed to be correct? I thought university lecturers held positions due to their talents in their respective susbjects - not becuase of their ability to implement social policy? On 25 Jan 2013 17:40, "Jeffrey Walton" <noloa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:07 PM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:57:51 +0000, Dan Ballance said: > > > >> ... > > > > Doesn't matter if he ends up a corporate knob or a freedom fighter. If > > he says "I promise to XYZ" you want him to be trustworthy on said > promise. > > > > You might want to ask the guys in Anonymous who got ratted out by one > > of their own how they feel about the word "trustworthy" regarding the > > rat who said "I promise not to rat you out". > :) > > There is no honor among thieves (or corporations, or lawyers, or...) >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
