> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Daniel M. Edwards > Sent: Friday, 13 June 2003 5:09 a.m. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Morning Wood Poll > > > The morning wood posts themselves are not what annoy me. It is the barrage > of posts that follow that do. Both sides of this argument are guilty. The > anti-wood party posts how Morning Wood is a moron after he posts then the > pro-wood party responses by calling that person a moron. It just keeps > going until I have 40 e-mails that can be summed by "Am Not" and "Are Too".
I agree with Daniel on this one. Remember that it *ALWAYS* takes TWO to start any flame. So, if morning wood gets moderated, you should moderate also all the other users who replied to him with flaming content. I also don't think he should be moderated. Hell, if you don't like him, kill file him, whatever - there are about one million ways of deleting his e-mails before you see them. He at least was good enough not to change e-mail address and headers for each message so he actually allows you to pretty easily auto-delete his e-mails, if you want to do that. OTOH, can you please explain to me how do you plan to moderate *ONE* person and you know only his e-mail? :) What keeps him from opening e-mail account on hotmail and posting under different name, but same conent? Then you have to moderate whole list and not just morning wood. Just my 2 cents and wasted bandwidth. Cheers, Bojan _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
