possibly its relevant because there was no actual minor involved.. only a cop over the age of 18. if i say im going to meet you to kill you and i show up at said place am i guilty of anything other than a threat????
wood ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joshua Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:18 PM Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] CERT Employee Gets Owned [Way Off Topic] > I'll remember that when your name is plastered all over the media. > > Explain to me how this crime is relevant? > > He worked for CERT. Fine. So do a number of other people. Are we going to > track all of their civil/criminal legal issues too? Do you believe that his > crime puts the reputation of CERT into question, or damages their ability to > do good work? > > The crime was not computer-security related. It was an attempt to exploit > another _person_, and the only relationship to computers was the medium of > the communication. In short, it's out-of-scope for this list. > > Cheers, > > Joshua Thomas > Network Operations Engineer > PowerOne Media, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >If you dont like it, un-subscribe or quit your bitching. Instead of > >replying with your lame comments making yourself look like a real ass. > > -badpack3t > > >> But seriously, sex with minors isn't exactly a parking ticket. > > > > But seriously, who cares. This is full-disclosure. Not > > > "people-in-the-security-industry-who-are-accused-of-crimes-that-people-dont- > > like". > > > > Kurt Seifried, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF > > AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574 > > http://seifried.org/security/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
